<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is JDF dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/is-jdf-dead/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/is-jdf-dead</link>
	<description>Marketing ... Think Differently</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:00:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is JDF dead or alive? &#124; Prepress Pilgrim</title>
		<link>http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/is-jdf-dead/comment-page-1#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Is JDF dead or alive? &#124; Prepress Pilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/?p=77#comment-594</guid>
		<description>[...] So I&#8217;ve talked about job definition format (JDF) in the past on this blog and mostly complained complained that its just a specification in desperate need of a product. You know, like people don&#8217;t use HTML, they use Internet Explorer or Firefox. So along comes this interesting post courtesy of Magiccom about the magic question: Is JDF dead? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So I&#8217;ve talked about job definition format (JDF) in the past on this blog and mostly complained complained that its just a specification in desperate need of a product. You know, like people don&#8217;t use HTML, they use Internet Explorer or Firefox. So along comes this interesting post courtesy of Magiccom about the magic question: Is JDF dead? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
