<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Magicomm Blog&#187; Flash &#8211; Magicomm Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/tag/flash/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.magicomm.biz/blog</link>
	<description>Marketing ... Think Differently</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:13:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Flash and SEO in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/flash-and-seo-in-2009</link>
		<comments>http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/flash-and-seo-in-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bishop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I&#8217;ve talked about the Future of Flash in the past, and well, technically now that the future is here I thought we should discuss it again.
First of all, I still stand by my original thoughts about Flash and SEO, however, Google has recently made some interesting improvements. One problem flash developers were facing was that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center; "><img class="size-full wp-image-437 aligncenter" title="Google and SEO 2009" src="http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/flashseo.gif" alt="Google and SEO 2009" width="550" height="150" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve talked about the <a href="http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/future-of-flash">Future of Flash</a> in the past, and well, technically now that the future is here I thought we should discuss it again.</p>
<p>First of all, I still stand by my original thoughts about <a href="http://www.jonbishop.org/2008/02/seo-and-flash/">Flash and SEO</a>, however, Google has recently made some interesting improvements. One problem flash developers were facing was that Google would index any external content linked in the flash files as a separate entity. That&#8217;s if Google would index the external content at all. But now Google has added &#8220;external resource loading&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote><p>This means that when a SWF file loads content from some other file—whether it&#8217;s text, HTML, XML, another SWF, etc.—we can index this external content too, and associate it with the parent SWF file and any documents that embed it.</p>
<p style="text-align: right; ">- <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/06/flash-indexing-with-external-resource.html">Official Google Webmaster Central Blog</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>So What&#8217;s The Current State of SEO and Flash?</strong></p>
<p>Although most SEOs would argue to stay away from flash because of it&#8217;s inability to index the content properly, I would argue that it almost doesn&#8217;t matter anymore. SEOmoz said something that caught my ear in their &#8220;<a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/seo-best-practices-seomozs-new-policies-based-on-updated-correlation-data">New Policies Based on Updated Correlation Data</a>&#8220;. They basically implied that header tags have less weight associated with them than they did in the past. It almost seems as if Google is paying less attention to the HTML markup and more attention to incoming links and conversations around the content.</p>
<p>So if your flash is getting indexed and you have a quality content with relevant incoming links, you should not have any problems with Flash being indexed and ranked properly in the search engines.</p>
<p>Now before you go and rip my head off I should state a few obvious problem that still exist:</p>
<ul>
<li>There are still accessibility issues (portable devices) when using flash elements however a good flash developer should <a href="http://www.webaim.org/techniques/flash/">know their way around them</a>.</li>
<li>HTML still provides a better format to organize your content for more efficient indexing</li>
</ul>
<p>The main takeaways here should be that people should not be afraid to at least experiment with flash. It no longer has the indexing issues it used to have. Also, Google still supports the use of <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/swfobject/">SWFObject</a> which takes care of a lot of the indexing problems flash still has.</p>
<p>- Photo by <a title="Link to Mazintosh &lt;&lt; de nuevo en Granada &gt;&gt;'s photostream" rel="dc:creator cc:attributionURL" href="/photos/mazintosh/">Mazintosh &lt;&lt; de nuevo en Granada &gt;&gt;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/flash-and-seo-in-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personalized Landing Page 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/personalized-landing-page-20</link>
		<comments>http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/personalized-landing-page-20#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bishop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cross Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Variable Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Variable Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direct Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landing Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vdp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/personalized_landing_page_20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it&#8217;s no news that a personalized landing page as a response portal to any kind of direct marketing campaign can increase response rates dramatically, but where&#8217;s the next step up?
Well it seems as if there are multiple cross-media technologies emerging from the web to help engage, interact and even entertain the user, therefore increasing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it&#8217;s no news that a personalized landing page as a response portal to any kind of direct marketing campaign can increase response rates dramatically, but where&#8217;s the next step up?</p>
<p>Well it seems as if there are multiple cross-media technologies emerging from the web to help engage, interact and even entertain the user, therefore increasing conversions. We&#8217;ve seen how XMPie can personalize images with its powerful VDP engine, but what if the user could change their name at runtime? Furthermore, what if the users name wasn&#8217;t in an image, but in a short movie? This is the future of PURLs and will be a hit in the social media world.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://power.magicomm.biz/"><br />
<img src="../../images/powerpic.gif" border="0" alt="Power of Magicomm" /><br />
</a>
</p>
<p>I received a link through Twitter for a website about a TV Show on FX and I was amazed at what they had done. <strong><a href="http://www.waltswisdom.com/blog/2008/030372pz3w">Here</a></strong> is the PURL someone made for me. This type of PURL has both a viral marketing factor to it and a huge fun component. Everyone wants to be the star of their own movie and show it off to all of their friends. Personalized video could very well be a key component in the future of PURLs as VDP in images becomes all too familiar.</p>
<p>Another key component will be the &#8220;on demand&#8221; factor. General URL&#8217;s are limited in how they perform once you leave the realm of your database. So how do you appeal to the masses with personalized landing pages? Well, why not have the website change at runtime. <strong><a href="http://power.magicomm.biz/">Here&#8217;s</a></strong> something my own company put together. Basically I wanted the user to be able to interact with the flash movie in real time from outside of the movie via the web-form. Using JavaScript, I was able to insert the users name into the newspaper at runtime and it&#8217;s had an amazing response. Using this method there are endless possibilities to creating unique personalized experiences where everyone has their own PURL.</p>
<p>People need a break from their everyday activities and these fun side trackers give them this opportunity and not only will these methods produce higher responses, but they&#8217;re great for PR. So the future is about Interactivity and Engagement, have fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/personalized-landing-page-20/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future of Flash</title>
		<link>http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/future-of-flash</link>
		<comments>http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/future-of-flash#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bishop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magicomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/future_of_flash</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People are starting to steer away from using flash in their websites and I think this is STUPID. We&#8217;re in the middle of an information revolution and Flash is one of our more advanced tools for making this happen. I think websites should use flash, as long as they do it right.
First off, people believe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are starting to steer away from using flash in their websites and I think this is STUPID. We&#8217;re in the middle of an information revolution and Flash is one of our more advanced tools for making this happen. I think websites should use flash, as long as they do it right.</p>
<p>First off, people believe that flash is SEO unfriendly. Let me clarify, it&#8217;s flash developers who make their flash SEO unfriendly. Their are multiple ways to make entire websites in flash and Search engines can and will index them accordingly. One way of doing this is by using Geoff Stearns&#8217; swfObject javascript. You just link to the main javascript file in the page head, and then call the function at the point on the page where you want your Flash movie to replace the default content. It makes it so users who don&#8217;t have Flash never even have to know that they&#8217;re missing something. Of course you have to make sure you have the content both on your site and in the flash movie.</p>
<p>Another method is by just loading the content from a separate XML. Voila, now Google can index your site.</p>
<p>So here is my extra two cents about the future of flash. I believe developers need to start using flash to its full interactive capabilities. By engaging the user you are more likely to entertain their presence on your site for longer and increase the productivity of your site. This can be done with interactive calendars, appointment booking systems, forums and blogging tools, Content Management Systems and whatever else your mind can conceive. The idea is to take everyday tools in life or software on your desktop and make them accessible online from anywhere via your website.</p>
<p>Another method of engagement, and sometimes a little harder to pull off, is personalization. Maybe a non intrusive way of using flash to make the website &#8220;Theirs&#8221;. This is is being used more and more in the marketing world and can open many doors to client/company relations. For example you can display text dynamically in your flash movie according to the date/time, the users location, or even their name. You could take it farther if somehow you could get information about the user before they even came to your site. Maybe you had them fill out a discrete form on one page to access private content, then on another page the possibilities are endless.</p>
<p>I guess people have been doing these things for awhile i just believe they haven&#8217;t been done right or creative enough. Engage your user and give your site functionality. Surprise them with what your site can do that others cant. PUSH FLASH TO ITS LIMITS. I don&#8217;t mean kill the users CPU. I mean be clever. Their was a pretty cool book put out awhile ago by O-Reilly called Flash Hacks that kind of gave me a glimpse into how flash can be manipulated to do cooler things. If you haven&#8217;t already, also look into AMFPHP, SWFObject and SWFAddress. All will make your flash experience 10 times better.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s all i have to say about that for now. Ill be the guy with the personalized flash logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.magicomm.biz/blog/future-of-flash/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
